[Opendnssec-user] Migrating from SoftHSM1 to 2

Mathieu Arnold mat at mat.cc
Thu Jan 23 11:19:40 UTC 2020


Unless I missed something, I do not think I got any comprehensive answer
for this question.

Am I overthinking it and should I just go with the "file" backend?

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:23:53PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Hi,
> I am currently running tests with SoftHSM2 to make sure the migration
> from 1 to 2 goes without any hitch.
> The documentation of SoftHSM is pretty sparse, and I am wondering about
> objectstore.backend.
> The default is "file", which uses the filesystem as a database, and
> another possibility is "db" which uses a SQLite3 database instead of the
> filesystem, like SoftHSM1 used to do.
> I am wondering what are the pro and cons of each, knowing that my
> OpenDNSSEC installation has thousands of domains.

Mathieu Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-user/attachments/20200123/b9c76e3e/attachment.bin>

More information about the Opendnssec-user mailing list