[Opendnssec-develop] Moving to JIRA "next week"
Siôn Lloyd
sion at nominet.org.uk
Sun Oct 30 12:12:11 UTC 2011
On 29/10/11 14:09, Jerry Lundström wrote:
> On 2011-10-27 16.06, Jerry Lundström<jerry at opendnssec.org> wrote:
>
> 1. History
> If we want to keep all the history the best solution is to keep them in a
> "OpenDNSSEC Pivotal History" project, not changing the iteration/version
> or the statuses.
>
> Do we want the history in JIRA? +1/-1
+1 if it is easy; I think that we could live without it though if it
looks like a lot of work.
> 2. IceBox
>
> +A/+B/+C?
B looks like our current "solution"; if people are happy with that then
we can stick with it. If not then +C. My only worry about C is that we
will have items that just keep slipping from one release to the next,
but we can cross that bridge if and when we come to it.
> 3. Statuses
> Here is my suggested status mapping:
> PT JIRA
> Closed -> Closed
> Not Yet Started -> Open
> Finished -> Closed
> Delivered -> Resolved
> Accepted -> Closed
> Rejected -> Closed
>
> Comments on the status mapping?
>
Shouldn't rejected go back to open? I thought that it meant that the fix
was rejected and had to be redone.
Sion
More information about the Opendnssec-develop
mailing list