[Opendnssec-develop] Moving to JIRA "next week"

Jerry Lundström jerry at opendnssec.org
Sun Oct 30 12:26:31 UTC 2011

On 2011-10-30 13.12, Siôn Lloyd <sion at nominet.org.uk> wrote:

>> 2. IceBox
>B looks like our current "solution"; if people are happy with that then
>we can stick with it. If not then +C. My only worry about C is that we
>will have items that just keep slipping from one release to the next,
>but we can cross that bridge if and when we come to it.

That is a problem we will likely have with any solution, its nice to have
nice-to-have but if they are never made why do we keep them?

>> 3. Statuses
>Shouldn't rejected go back to open? I thought that it meant that the fix
>was rejected and had to be redone.

Ah okay, if it was used like that of course it should be mapped to Open.


More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list