[Opendnssec-develop] Supported build dependency for libraries etc

Jerry Lundström jerry at opendnssec.org
Tue Oct 4 12:50:19 UTC 2011

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:37 PM, John Dickinson <jad at sinodun.com> wrote:

> My initial thoughts are that anything where we support multiple versions
> (e.g. if we supported ruby18 and ruby19 and jruby) or if the version changes
> often then we should have jenkins install it. At the moment there are only
> single versions of group 1 listed in the documentation and I have no feel
> for how much this list changes.

The first group is the interesting one. We can support specific/minimum
version or we can say we support ubuntu 10.04 and then we have to rely on
the versions in that dist.

A vote perhaps, +specific or +dist ?

> group 2 should use distribution defaults.

Agreed, this would just be too much work.

> SoftHSM is currently built from trunk on every run of the build/test tree.
> Do we need to support older versions?

Right now SoftHSM is tied to the OpenDNSSEC project so I don't think we need
to worry here but we want to set up tests for it also.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-develop/attachments/20111004/a65b0568/attachment.htm>

More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list