[Opendnssec-develop] Issue handling question

[Jerry Lundström]

Hi,

We don't have any real preference, but one thought would be to maybe
not have issues with two components because work wont be done in
parallel  since its only assign to one person at a time. That would
have made this issue two issues at start.

For this issue I think you should clone or recreate it, link then, set
it to the same reporter and see that there is just one component per
issue.

Then you can close the original to mark your work finished.

/Jerry

On 22 nov 2011, at 15:41, "Siôn Lloyd" <sion at nominet.org.uk> wrote:

> Hi.
>
> I have just commited code to address issue OPENDNSSEC-10.
>
> https://issues.opendnssec.org/browse/OPENDNSSEC-10
>
> This needs to be done for the enforcerNG also; so I probably shouldn't resolve the issue or it will go away completely... If I remove it from the 1.4.0 release then it will look like it was never done, unless you look at subversion.
>
> How would we like to deal with this? Subtasks or cloned issues come to mind, but if we have a preference then I'd like to be consistent with that.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sion
> _______________________________________________
> Opendnssec-develop mailing list
> Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org
> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop