[Opendnssec-user] Recommendations for production use

[Arun Natarajan]

Thanks, that is one good reason use the compiled version. The binary
updates from the OS vendor takes long time always.

--
arun

On 17 May 2016 at 14:54, Benno Overeinder <benno at nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Maybe not yet available in all distributions, but you might want to go
> with OpenDNSSEC 1.4.10 that includes many important bug fixes.
>
> — Benno
>
>
> > On 17 May 2016, at 11:27, Arun Natarajan <arun at arunns.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion.
> >
> > On 15 May 2016 at 13:13, Emil Natan <shlyoko at gmail.com> wrote:
> > As a rule of  a thumb (for me at least), if DNS/DNSSEC is your core
> business go for the source and building the software by yourself. You would
> like finer control over build and features. Otherwise stick with whatever
> provided by the OS.
> >
> > ena
> >
> > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Arun N S <arun at arunns.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >  Any recommendation for the opendnssec / softhsm installation candidates
> for production? Should we stick with the OS shipped version
> softhsm-2.0.0rc1-3.el7.x86_64, opendnssec-1.4.7-3.el7.x86_64 (incase of
> Redhat 7) or compile and install the latest stable from opendnssec.org?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > --
> > arun
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opendnssec-user mailing list
> > Opendnssec-user at lists.opendnssec.org
> > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opendnssec-user mailing list
> > Opendnssec-user at lists.opendnssec.org
> > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
>
> --
> Benno J. Overeinder
> NLnet Labs
> http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-user/attachments/20160517/a673533c/attachment.htm>