[Opendnssec-user] Recommendations for production use

Arun Natarajan arun at arunns.com
Tue May 17 11:27:27 CEST 2016


Thanks for the suggestion.

On 15 May 2016 at 13:13, Emil Natan <shlyoko at gmail.com> wrote:

> As a rule of  a thumb (for me at least), if DNS/DNSSEC is your core
> business go for the source and building the software by yourself. You would
> like finer control over build and features. Otherwise stick with whatever
> provided by the OS.
>
> ena
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Arun N S <arun at arunns.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>  Any recommendation for the opendnssec / softhsm installation candidates
>> for production? Should we stick with the OS shipped
>> version softhsm-2.0.0rc1-3.el7.x86_64, opendnssec-1.4.7-3.el7.x86_64
>> (incase of Redhat 7) or compile and install the latest stable from
>> opendnssec.org?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> --
>> arun
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opendnssec-user mailing list
>> Opendnssec-user at lists.opendnssec.org
>> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-user/attachments/20160517/573b3553/attachment.html>


More information about the Opendnssec-user mailing list