[Opendnssec-user] Parent and child on same NS?

[Paul Wouters]

On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Rick van Rein wrote:

> Is it correct that a signed parent and signed child zone can never
> share the same name server?  For instance, the same secondary?

No, that is incorrect. There was a bug found years ago with respect
to the DS record, where parent and child servers need to serve
things differently because of the unexpected location of the DS
record on "old unaware" clients, but that's a thing of the past.

> Am I overlooking anything here?

Are you seeing a problem somewhere?

Paul