[Opendnssec-user] User input on OpenDNSSEC Auditor deprecation

[Carlos M. Martinez]

I like the idea of the separate package, just like softhsm.

Carlos

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Ondřej Surý <ondrej at sury.org> wrote:

> Split it out to separate package or drop it. The less dependencies the
> (core) OpenDNSSEC will have, the better.
> 
> But keep the hooks to run zone checks before pushing it out.
> 
> O.
> 
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 14:39, Jakob Schlyter <jakob at kirei.se> wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> Due to the inability to operate together with upcoming Signer Engine features like IXFR, we're considering removing the Auditor from future versions of OpenDNSSEC. Other reasons for this is that we believe that the Auditor has played is part in the OpenDNSSEC development process, it now often introduces more problems for our users than helping and there are now multiple alternative zone checkers available.
>> 
>> We now solicit user input on this plan from users activly using the Auditor (as opposed to just using it since it is enabled by default). Please submit your comments to the OpenDNSSEC users list (opendnssec-user at lists.opendnssec.org) no later than December 2nd.
>> 
>>        jakob
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opendnssec-user mailing list
>> Opendnssec-user at lists.opendnssec.org
>> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ondřej Surý <ondrej at sury.org>
> _______________________________________________
> Opendnssec-user mailing list
> Opendnssec-user at lists.opendnssec.org
> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-user