[Opendnssec-develop] libhsm: parts renamed during 2.0 work

[Rick van Rein]

Hi,

> The name hsm_key describes it perfectly, because its a database object
> with the HSM key content. It was called HSM key in protobuf also but it
> was C++ stil so it was HsmKey.

So the protobuf-originated code is the new one.  Changing that is less heavy on the project, esp. regarding porting of patches.

> I would like to have the database object called hsm_key and the libhsm
> stuff prefixed with libhsm because that clearly separates the
> functionality.

I rather disagree.  The prefix “libhsm_” instead of “hsm_” focusses on the minor detail of it being a library, whereas the point of the “hsm_” prefix is to focus on the idea of having an API to the HSM.

These two reasons means that I vote for Matthijs’ proposal.

-Rick
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-develop/attachments/20140520/2917900b/attachment.bin>