[Opendnssec-develop] kasp draft

Yuri Schaeffer yuri at nlnetlabs.nl
Mon Jul 28 13:18:11 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> It would be good to hear what others think. Planning to submit this
> to dnsop list for discussion.

tl;dr: I'm with Sion

There is not functional difference in using another distribution,
therefore fine to leave it as an implementors choice. Lets have jitter
as the parameters to whatever function is used.

My motivation: The weight distribution of the algorithm used has *no
effect* on any of the timing decisions. The min and max values of the
algorithm *do* in fact influence the rollovers.

//Yuri
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlPWTZMACgkQI3PTR4mhavjP3QCgtQvkNwMRVNNFOIfQ6hTx8xrW
wC0An3kiZo3vhKaIBp5jghwIFnhMFwrJ
=J88w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list