reply: reply: reply: [Opendnssec-develop] signed serial > unsigned serial?

wangguodong wanggd at conac.cn
Thu Sep 12 10:15:44 CEST 2013


 

Yes, you are right.  It's not restrict an unsigned zone or signed zone.

 

I am sorry for that.

 

The zone can be accessed by a third party such as the data escrow provider,
so unsigned zone may be also useful.

 

 

Warren

 

发件人: Olaf Kolkman [mailto:olaf at NLnetLabs.nl] 
发送时间: 2013年9月11日 20:23
收件人: Jakob Schlyter
抄送: wangguodong; opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org
主题: Re: reply: reply: [Opendnssec-develop] signed serial > unsigned
serial?

 

 

On 11 sep. 2013, at 13:49, Jakob Schlyter <jakob at kirei.se> wrote:





I cannot see where the AGB states it is the unsigned zone that is to be
served.

 

Me neither, nor do I understand why the AGB would call for a zone different
from the zone that appeared in the DNS.

 

If ICANN where to clarify that the AGB should be interpreted that an
unsigned zone is to be served then I would like to see the motivation for
that requirement.

 

--Olaf

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-develop/attachments/20130912/e3942cd2/attachment.html>


More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list