reply: reply: reply: [Opendnssec-develop] signed serial > unsigned serial?
wanggd at conac.cn
Thu Sep 12 10:15:44 CEST 2013
Yes, you are right. It's not restrict an unsigned zone or signed zone.
I am sorry for that.
The zone can be accessed by a third party such as the data escrow provider,
so unsigned zone may be also useful.
发件人: Olaf Kolkman [mailto:olaf at NLnetLabs.nl]
发送时间: 2013年9月11日 20:23
收件人: Jakob Schlyter
抄送: wangguodong; opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org
主题: Re: reply: reply: [Opendnssec-develop] signed serial > unsigned
On 11 sep. 2013, at 13:49, Jakob Schlyter <jakob at kirei.se> wrote:
I cannot see where the AGB states it is the unsigned zone that is to be
Me neither, nor do I understand why the AGB would call for a zone different
from the zone that appeared in the DNS.
If ICANN where to clarify that the AGB should be interpreted that an
unsigned zone is to be served then I would like to see the motivation for
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Opendnssec-develop