[Opendnssec-develop] Multithreaded Enforcer issues before we can merge with trunk

Jerry Lundström jerry at opendnssec.org
Fri Aug 24 09:13:03 UTC 2012

On Aug 24, 2012, at 11:08 , Siôn Lloyd wrote:
>>> 1. Logging
> +1 Does this decision effect the enforcer-NG also? Do we want it to be consistent?

No this does not affect NG and there is very little logging in NG today (or at least what I've seen).

>>> 2. Enabling of multithreaded Enforcer
> +1; although leave the compile flag in, in case folk want to build without it?
> It also means that package maintainers will not need to build two versions (or decide on one or the other)
> Are we going to make the "enforcer workers" tag mandatory? I vote for optional and if it doesn't exist then workers == 1.

We can easily redo it to --disable-enforcer-workers.


Jerry Lundström - OpenDNSSEC Developer

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-develop/attachments/20120824/a4d81b4a/attachment.bin>

More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list