[Opendnssec-develop] Moving to JIRA "next week"

Jakob Schlyter jakob at kirei.se
Sat Oct 29 13:31:52 UTC 2011

On 29 okt 2011, at 15:09, Jerry Lundström wrote:

> Do we want the history in JIRA? +1/-1

As long as we keep Pivotal Around, I'd say -1.

> 2. IceBox
> The IceBox is a status in PT that are used for all the issues that haven't
> been assigned to an iteration. JIRA does not have this, you have the
> future issues all unassigned instead. Also the fake releases we have in
> the IceBox (Nice to have, More then nice to have etc) is also something
> that doesn't exist in JIRA.
> Solution A:
> There is a labeling system in JIRA that we could use for tagging issues in
> different ways but its free texted so there might be a bit of a problem
> keeping it constant and we need to create filters to easily find them.
> Solution B:
> We could use fake versions to group up issues like "Nice to have".
> Solution C:
> Be a little more strict on how we keep issues and actually assign them
> right away to a version so we don't have "Nice to have" laying around for
> years (there are some from 2009 in PT today).
> +A/+B/+C?


> 3. Statuses
> Here is my suggested status mapping:
> PT                 JIRA
> Closed          -> Closed
> Not Yet Started -> Open
> Finished        -> Closed
> Delivered       -> Resolved
> Accepted        -> Closed
> Rejected        -> Closed
> Comments on the status mapping?

Works for me.

Would it be an option to manually add stuff we will continue work on to JIRA, and just let the leftovers in Pivotal (setting everyone except me & jerry to Viewers) ?


More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list