[Opendnssec-develop] OpenDNSSEC 1.4 and the auditor

Nick van den Heuvel nick.vandenheuvel at sidn.nl
Fri Nov 4 13:13:34 UTC 2011

So auditor default off in OpenDNSSEC?

Met vriendelijke groet,

Nick van den Heuvel
Test analist

SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | Postbus 5022 | 6802 EA | ARNHEM
T +31 (0)26 352 55 93 | F +31 (0)26 352 55 05 | jabber: nick.vandenheuvel at jabber.sidn.nl
nick.vandenheuvel at sidn.nl | www.sidn.nl

SIDN heeft een nieuw domein! Sinds 31 oktober zijn wij gevestigd op een nieuw adres: 
Meander 501, 6825 MD Arnhem. 
Het postadres en de telefoonnummers blijven ongewijzigd.

SIDN has a new domain! Since 31 October, our office address is:
Meander 501, 6825 MD Arnhem, The Netherlands. 
Our postal address and phone numbers remain unchanged.

-----Original Message-----
From: opendnssec-develop-bounces at lists.opendnssec.org [mailto:opendnssec-develop-bounces at lists.opendnssec.org] On Behalf Of Jakob Schlyter
Sent: vrijdag 4 november 2011 14:11
To: Alex Dalitz
Cc: <opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org>
Subject: Re: [Opendnssec-develop] OpenDNSSEC 1.4 and the auditor

On 4 nov 2011, at 14:01, Alex Dalitz wrote:

> It seems to me that it is now time to retire the auditor, starting from version 1.4. This would also remove all the nasty Ruby dependencies from OpenDNSSEC.
> What does everyone else think?

I believe is the right decision and we came to the same conclusion at the OAB meeting earlier this week. We did however suggest that the auditor is kept in the tree (i.e., in trunk/auditor) and that the hook to call an auditor (which could be the legacy one, or something like validns) is kept in the signer engine.


Jakob Schlyter
Kirei AB - http://www.kirei.se/

Opendnssec-develop mailing list
Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org

More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list