[Opendnssec-develop] performance test

Matthijs Mekking matthijs at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Mar 9 15:56:42 UTC 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I thought that the SCA6000 could do 64 operations in parallel. But your
test shows that increasing the number of drudgers to above 64 still
improves the performance.

Am I wrong about the number of concurrent threads on the SCA6000 or is
providing more drudgers than threads on the HSM peaking the performance?

Best regards,

Matthijs


On 03/09/2011 03:59 PM, Rickard Bellgrim wrote:
> 
> On 9 mar 2011, at 13.57, Rickard Bellgrim wrote:
> 
>>
>> On 8 mar 2011, at 16.33, Rickard Bellgrim wrote:
>>
>>> 1 worker, 32 drudgers:
>>> [STATS] se RR[count=2322389 time=72(sec)] NSEC[count=998562 time=34(sec)] RRSIG[new=1002849 reused=0 time=461(sec) avg=2175(sig/sec)] AUDIT[time=0(sec)] TOTAL[time=596(sec)]
>>
>> Success!
>>
>> 1 worker, 64 drudgers (230 % CPU and 2.6 GB memory):
>>
>> [STATS] se RR[count=2322389 time=72(sec)] NSEC[count=998562 time=34(sec)] RRSIG[new=1002744 reused=0 time=78(sec) avg=12855(sig/sec)] AUDIT[time=0(sec)] TOTAL[time=211(sec)]
>>
> 
> Running with 80 drudgers and thread safe statistics. You can see that the number of signatures are back on normal levels.
> 
> [STATS] se RR[count=2322389 time=71(sec)] NSEC[count=998562 time=34(sec)] RRSIG[new=1002849 reused=0 time=76(sec) avg=13195(sig/sec)] AUDIT[time=0(sec)] TOTAL[time=211(sec)]
> [STATS] se RR[count=2322389 time=72(sec)] NSEC[count=998562 time=34(sec)] RRSIG[new=1002849 reused=0 time=75(sec) avg=13371(sig/sec)] AUDIT[time=0(sec)] TOTAL[time=211(sec)]
> [STATS] se RR[count=2322389 time=71(sec)] NSEC[count=998562 time=34(sec)] RRSIG[new=1002849 reused=0 time=76(sec) avg=13195(sig/sec)] AUDIT[time=0(sec)] TOTAL[time=211(sec)]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Opendnssec-develop mailing list
> Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org
> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNd6M6AAoJEA8yVCPsQCW5kCEIAKEbg/uA01ZMQQSjj4msGhWM
NG+ybsQykx69Sj/9WplzvRxOgDAkEiZvSJ4riQFJjlEaFCLogeKDjBsinic0rjPw
zZaQe1Di1btuNMqK5kS84kjIeWgVP6h4TX0C1CmCfcKY5cfZfNZjBDz6bjZ8b+ld
wcI1MYbGlTYXlGlrklZmniutmV6P/yN+kRizB8DF4r1uDrRi1oNvgXMolzYXahN4
uHtL66rcabjbEMpHtkYZ/rsTDoAAwsxQnJ9EyWC1EgTzew3Hcn+8oSoiwwdP6Dir
N6iAPNekymWK6tFohosV+R9WslKdhqZiS8gY44dQjwANXSe7UO1HwZGlMA3XI/Q=
=kVeX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list