[Opendnssec-develop] Optimization of the sorter

[Rickard Bellgrim]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

> That begs the question on how much effort folk want to put in
> optimization of v1.
>
> Are we looking a problem that inhibits the use of opendnssec for the
> core stakeholders or are we looking at an optimization that is dully
> needed for the somewhat longer term? Is the work done for v1.1 portable
> to v2?

The current solution is working for us now, but we need better performance in the future (for others with larger zone than .SE). We are currently just looking at the sorter and I think that the new code could be useful in the future as well. Just get the zone info from database/memory/pipe/etc instead of a file. For 1.1 we do not want any big changes, because that would distract us from 2.0.

The overall optimization of OpenDNSSEC is a topic that needs to be discussed in the meeting in Amsterdam.

// Rickard

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 9.8.3 (Build 4028)
Charset: utf-8

wsBUAwUBS0xnyuCjgaNTdVjaAQiXlwf4qOkOhm+DvDZTbwXybQX34sfWutLOpmDz
KOvoSBD0nvmWPAkUs8QAZWHrDGuWA6fW0PLtvNbbDr7UP5ca8ja2KPBEfbx8Wq44
tiiFX616RKwvhIPZSh2+U/tpVdYmz+AljrsmS/Wp3mx2kLiyoFydN/fxqGWvrISh
GAQ+t/7Gyo5+wTiS+vCTMpiPdlmGxy+SrDOGGuSUx4pW2s4JSGFWmOJqNwKX/TFs
pxXjm9AofAV95W1a0NdUc1RvVnt45hNKlhMccJFAd2bFp2ndecAxAE2LxKx0cVrY
d6NumbRphcPHk+NcI+iGacveN4ww/d1Wz9AZbXeu4VBkDlM9p1X0
=5hT7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-develop/attachments/20100112/42a36744/attachment.htm>