[Opendnssec-develop] Missing TTLs in zone files
roy at nominet.org.uk
Mon Oct 19 10:23:52 UTC 2009
opendnssec-develop-bounces at lists.opendnssec.org wrote on 10/19/2009
> Ray.Bellis at nominet.org.uk
> Sent by: opendnssec-develop-bounces at lists.opendnssec.org
> 10/19/2009 12:21 PM
> Matthijs Mekking <matthijs at NLnetLabs.nl>
> Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org, Alexd at nominet.org.uk
> Re: [Opendnssec-develop] Missing TTLs in zone files
> > I looked it up and that seems to be the proper action, according to
> > 1034:
> > A key item in the SOA is the 86400 second minimum TTL, which means
> > all authoritative data in the zone has at least that TTL, although
> > higher values may be explicitly specified.
> The minimum TTL field isn't used for that any more - it's now the
> negative caching TTL (RFC 2308).
Where do modern implementations get their 'default TTL' value from if the
per record TTL and TTL directives are omitted?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Opendnssec-develop