[Opendnssec-develop] *blush* The experts agree. CKA_ID it is.

[Rickard Bondesson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

> If I store the same value in both CKA_LABEL and CKA_ID with 
> pkcs11-tool, lets say 090310084749289287
> 
> Then pkcs11-tool will present this:
> 
>   label:      090310084749289287
>   ID:         303930333130303834373439323839323837
> 
> They are represented by the same bytes in the token, but 
> presented diffrently.

Ohh sorry this is what I should have said:

If I store the same value in both CKA_LABEL and CKA_ID in my token, lets say { 30 39 30 33 31 30 30 38 34 37 34 39 32 38 39 32 38 37 } (a byte array)

Then pkcs11-tool will present this:

  label:      090310084749289287
  ID:         303930333130303834373439323839323837

// Rickard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 9.8.3 (Build 4028)
Charset: utf-8

wsBVAwUBScN23OCjgaNTdVjaAQjIggf/dbg2mXERzLwZp38lLn3EhZbTd9qLhUQi
2s8jOZqr0mpRm3H5mVGkpE69C4NgVZaC5ocY0N8Jm5sGDrvvAoxulduIHL49kHbH
WaT88inlxjLfHHZSJ9CCpCcFr2KhwjA2wqNCfq3pVcXjRytMmBkJjM8QwuEmwkZG
pC31PbPxE62FTPPqlzjPgYVq/zIVGqPizzzx0NKLEpWVx9ehz6dGT/1CdierfnrB
YmGXcfhmFLyoE+tvf4fM+0CvT0syM2bW5Xb6TCGOfaCbp5t019NYVsNZKjpRVBfM
NlLARLHT+yl4eFj1JkAoLU2gXqcozX29EWtgYrSKOC+d5eaRG7f/kw==
=MxPQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----