[Opendnssec-develop] Sun SCA6000 on Ubuntu

Jakob Schlyter jakob at kirei.se
Tue Jun 30 11:33:18 UTC 2009

On 30 jun 2009, at 07.29, Jelte Jansen wrote:

> roy at nominet.org.uk wrote:
>> In case of lack of support for certain functions by an HSM, do we  
>> provide
>> an alternative just for that function? We might use softHSM just  
>> for the
>> hashing, right?
> that would require a configured softHSM only to provide hashing  
> functions, in which case it would be much easier to use the hash  
> functions that are now built into ldns. But we don't do such a thing  
> at the moment.

oh, my bad - I thought we only used the ldns functions. would that be  
an easy change? or something we can detect at runtime?


More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list