[Opendnssec-develop] Auditor croaks on APL RR
Olaf Kolkman
olaf at NLnetLabs.nl
Mon Dec 14 10:24:54 UTC 2009
On Dec 14, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Rickard Bellgrim wrote:
> > Do people think this should be supported?
>
> Yes, but the best way is to sync ldns and dnsruby so that they support the same RR types.
But the problem is that you will not be able to guarantee that the libs are in sync.
Most people will want to maintain these library through their port/pkg maint. systems. And those will at some point be out of sync. I would really like to see resiliency against that.
>
> > If so, should it go in 1.0 or 1.1?
>
> If we want this fix, it would only be good to have this before we have synced the libraries (if we are not mentioning the case where the user haven't upgraded the libraries). So if we want ldns and dnsruby to be in sync for 1.1, then this fix should be in 1.0.
>
Yep.
--Olaf
________________________________________________________
Olaf M. Kolkman NLnet Labs
Science Park 140,
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/ 1098 XG Amsterdam
More information about the Opendnssec-develop
mailing list