[Opendnssec-develop] SUPPORT-130

[Matthijs Mekking]

On 03/12/2014 02:51 PM, Jerry Lundström wrote:
> On 12 Mar 2014, at 14:40 , Patrik Wallström <patrik.wallstrom at iis.se> wrote:
> 
>> On 12 Mar 2014, at 14:32, Matthijs Mekking <matthijs at nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> Any thoughts on https://issues.opendnssec.org/browse/SUPPORT-130 ?
>>
>> I think that changing the semantics of “keep” would be problematic. Wouldn’t Egor be better off to choose some other serial number scheme than “keep”?
> 
> We should not change how keep works and introducing something new that potentially breaks more then it help isn’t a good idea.
> 
> /2c

Exactly my thought, but Egor identifies a need of a new serial value
which we can call "keep_and_dont_check_increment" (and then we need to
come up with a better name).




> 
> --
> Jerry Lundström - OpenDNSSEC Developer
> http://www.opendnssec.org/
>