[Opendnssec-develop] kasp draft
Matthijs Mekking
matthijs at nlnetlabs.nl
Fri Jul 4 13:23:42 UTC 2014
On 07/04/2014 03:15 PM, Yuri Schaeffer wrote:
>> We would like to hear your opinions about this and get your
>> feedback.
>
> 1) 2.1.1.2
> (...)
> The choice and case modeling types are not included in the actual
> data tree. In the case that NSEC is used, the XML example would be:
>
> <Denial>
> <NSEC/>
> </Denial>
>
> I don't understand what 'choice and case modeling types' are.
Its YANG language (RFC 6020). Basically you specify in your model that
you have a choice: Either the schema contains <this> or the schema
contains <that>. You cannot have both <this> and <that> at the same
time. A case modeling type is a choice option so to say.
> 2) 2.1.1.4. Zone
>
> 3. Serial - The format of the serial number in the signed zone.
> This is one of: "counter", datecounter, unixtime, keep.
>
> Perhaps Serial should not be defined as a string but rather a type
> that has one of the above values.
I was thinking of that too. I'll add that as an issue to be resolved.
> 3) 2.1.1.4
> It is unclear which values in the Zone>SOA container are optional.
Ok, I'll take a look.
> 4) If everything in the parent container is optional, why MUST we have
> a parent container?
This can probably be a MAY. We started with kasp.rnc with this document
and then relaxed some rules.
I created issues for these in github:
https://github.com/matje/dnsop-kasp/issues.
Thanks Yuri!
Best regards,
Matthijs
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opendnssec-develop mailing list
> Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org
> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop
>
More information about the Opendnssec-develop
mailing list