From sara at sinodun.com Tue Oct 1 10:02:01 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:02:01 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Off sick again Message-ID: <9BDC06CE-7161-4019-B2E2-E92A5CE0FF5E@sinodun.com> Probably be off a few days.... Sara. Sent from my iPhone From jerry at opendnssec.org Tue Oct 1 11:12:31 2013 From: jerry at opendnssec.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jerry_Lundstr=F6m?=) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:12:31 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] SoftHSM 1.3.5 release Message-ID: <403E47DB-9BF1-43A5-8955-6685B853AC2F@opendnssec.org> Hi all, Version 1.3.5 of SoftHSM has been released. Bugfixes: * SOFTHSM-45: Improved handling of a busy database * SUPPORT-76: Add -Wall -Werror flags and fix the warnings. Fix more warnings on EPEL. Download: https://dist.opendnssec.org/source/softhsm-1.3.5.tar.gz https://dist.opendnssec.org/source/softhsm-1.3.5.tar.gz.sig SHA1 b3857da8304f6effb04c7c27e2ad013372c04614 SHA256 28b5062a13450faf6099fcb82d25d21f0ac7d202ba31ec85e943246cdcf87ebd Distribution Key 2013 https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/OpenDNSSEC/PGP Regards, OpenDNSSEC Team -- Jerry Lundstr?m - OpenDNSSEC Developer http://www.opendnssec.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 625 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From rick at openfortress.nl Thu Oct 3 09:16:54 2013 From: rick at openfortress.nl (Rick van Rein (OpenFortress)) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:16:54 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Multiple views with current OpenDNSSEC (well, almost) Message-ID: Hi all, The issue of multiple views came up again on the user list. While thinking about it, I realised it could be done in a relatively simple manner, without (or hardly without) burden to the Enforcer. The thing is, if you share most of the infrastructure (Enforcer, database and HSM) between the views, then all that changes is the Signer. It would be possible to run multiple signers, each handling a name. They would be sharing the keying material, which is a great simplification relative to the split-key models of comlpetely independent ODS setups. The only things that would need to change are interface issues: - the Enforcer should be kicking >1 Signers - the SignConf files must be rewritten with path names that match the views' inputs and outputs Or am I forgetting anything here? This function could perhaps be performed by an intermediate which splits the signer, splitting the signconf & kick interface between Enforcer and Signer. This might be integrated with the Signer itself, which would fork itself with various configurations; or, it could be aware of multiple views as different paths to input/output files; it could list (zone,view) combinations in the queue, or it could iterate over all views (input/output paths) of a zone when handling a zone. So, questions: * Would it be problematic to the Enforcer to generate _relative_ paths to Input / Output files for zones? * Would it be problematic to the Signer to prefix a per-view directory in front of the signconf'd Input / Output files? * Would it be difficult to have multiple zones with different dirname+relpath locations for their files in the same queue? I hope this is useful :) Cheers, -Rick From jakob at kirei.se Mon Oct 7 06:03:41 2013 From: jakob at kirei.se (Jakob Schlyter) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:03:41 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Multiple views with current OpenDNSSEC (well, almost) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <318C12C1-CD85-4612-B479-C5EA5551B269@kirei.se> On 3 okt 2013, at 11:16, Rick van Rein (OpenFortress) wrote: > Or am I forgetting anything here? You also have to sync events such as ds-seen, but other than that I think what you propose might work. jakob From rick at openfortress.nl Mon Oct 7 06:39:29 2013 From: rick at openfortress.nl (Rick van Rein (OpenFortress)) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:39:29 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Multiple views with current OpenDNSSEC (well, almost) In-Reply-To: <318C12C1-CD85-4612-B479-C5EA5551B269@kirei.se> References: <318C12C1-CD85-4612-B479-C5EA5551B269@kirei.se> Message-ID: Hi Jakob / others, >> Or am I forgetting anything here? > > You also have to sync events such as ds-seen, but other than that I think what you propose might work. Thsnks for confirming that! Do you and others see this split-Signer approach as a way that we could officialise, and integrate into OpenDNSSEC? The reason to put off my previous, split-Enforcer based approach was, if I recall correctly, the difficulty of getting it into, notably, the Enforcer. As for ds-seen and ds-unseen, I thought about these too, and concluded that this was scripted external to OpenDNSSEC and therefore the perfect place to capture local fun. I don't think it would be reasonable to ask the Enforcer to change in this respect. Cheers, -Rick From sara at sinodun.com Mon Oct 7 08:22:04 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:22:04 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Off sick again In-Reply-To: <9BDC06CE-7161-4019-B2E2-E92A5CE0FF5E@sinodun.com> References: <9BDC06CE-7161-4019-B2E2-E92A5CE0FF5E@sinodun.com> Message-ID: Hi All, I am back in the office now, but only for a few hours today. I am in most of tomorrow, but then busy the rest of the week (but will try to pick up email). Then I'm at RIPE next week?. I have approximately a zillion emails to look through so I will do my best to catch up asap but may take a while :-) Later today I'll send out a proper reminder for the team meeting, which is scheduled for tomorrow at 14:30 CEST. Sara. On 1 Oct 2013, at 11:02, Sara Dickinson wrote: > Probably be off a few days.... > > Sara. > > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-develop mailing list > Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop From jerry at opendnssec.org Mon Oct 7 08:47:59 2013 From: jerry at opendnssec.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jerry_Lundstr=F6m?=) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:47:59 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Multiple views with current OpenDNSSEC (well, almost) In-Reply-To: References: <318C12C1-CD85-4612-B479-C5EA5551B269@kirei.se> Message-ID: <6BCA1467-BC10-4A6F-8B26-725959D61878@opendnssec.org> Hi, On Oct 7, 2013, at 08:39 , Rick van Rein (OpenFortress) wrote: >>> Or am I forgetting anything here? >> >> You also have to sync events such as ds-seen, but other than that I think what you propose might work. > > Thsnks for confirming that! Let's not rush ahead now. > Do you and others see this split-Signer approach as a way that we could officialise, and integrate into OpenDNSSEC? The reason to put off my previous, split-Enforcer based approach was, if I recall correctly, the difficulty of getting it into, notably, the Enforcer. A split-Signer approach is, in my view, wrong. It will add unnecessary operational complexity and feels more like a workaround then a solid solution. The discussion so far has been 2 views, one internal and one external, but what if you want 20 views? Should there be 20 Signers running just because one zone has 20 views, this does not hold up in the long run. It would be a lot better and more stable to add support for views correctly into the Enforcer and Signer and it might not even be a big job. Basically it has to do with the internal design of how zones and processed, the zone name is the unique key identifying a zone and what needs to be done is to add a view identifier that is included into the unique key for the zone (unless I missing something). This will enable Enforcer and Signer to have different paths, configurations, input and output for the same zone but for different views. Please also have in mind that even if this may not be much work we really need to focus on releasing 2.0 (that is dragging a few years) so this might be something to consider for 2.2 . /Jerry -- Jerry Lundstr?m - OpenDNSSEC Developer http://www.opendnssec.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 625 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From rick at openfortress.nl Mon Oct 7 08:59:11 2013 From: rick at openfortress.nl (Rick van Rein (OpenFortress)) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:59:11 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Multiple views with current OpenDNSSEC (well, almost) In-Reply-To: <6BCA1467-BC10-4A6F-8B26-725959D61878@opendnssec.org> References: <318C12C1-CD85-4612-B479-C5EA5551B269@kirei.se> <6BCA1467-BC10-4A6F-8B26-725959D61878@opendnssec.org> Message-ID: <26928A0B-34F9-4A0C-B98E-25E31313D27C@openfortress.nl> Hello, > A split-Signer approach is, in my view, wrong. It will add unnecessary operational complexity and feels more like a workaround then a solid solution. The discussion so far has been 2 views, one internal and one external, but what if you want 20 views? Should there be 20 Signers running just because one zone has 20 views, this does not hold up in the long run. Agreed. The split I propose is a conceptual one, and not the best possible implementation. Even if I use the lingo of an implementation to sketch the practicality. What I wanted to point out with this split-signer approach is that it could make sense to have an Enforcer reign over the keys that are shared among the views. Such shared key management greatly simplifies the child / parent transition when the child has views and the parent does not, or maybe has different views. This is a conceptual simplification, not merely a simplification of the implementation. > It would be a lot better and more stable to add support for views correctly into the Enforcer and Signer and it might not even be a big job. Basically it has to do with the internal design of how zones and processed, the zone name is the unique key identifying a zone and what needs to be done is to add a view identifier that is included into the unique key for the zone (unless I missing something). This will enable Enforcer and Signer to have different paths, configurations, input and output for the same zone but for different views. That's what I'm saying indeed :-) -- except that I'd propose to not make the Enforcer aware of the split. I've posted a question to Matthijs with precisely what you are describing here, asking him if it seems feasible to him. Then there'd be one Signer process with a queue that holds (zone,view) identified jobs. > Please also have in mind that even if this may not be much work we really need to focus on releasing 2.0 (that is dragging a few years) so this might be something to consider for 2.2 . My goal is to get this on the road map. I think it is missing from OpenDNSSEC and we should set it as a goal. I asked Sara to put it up on tomorrow's meeting. Thanks, -Rick From jerry at opendnssec.org Mon Oct 7 09:18:40 2013 From: jerry at opendnssec.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jerry_Lundstr=F6m?=) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:18:40 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Multiple views with current OpenDNSSEC (well, almost) In-Reply-To: <26928A0B-34F9-4A0C-B98E-25E31313D27C@openfortress.nl> References: <318C12C1-CD85-4612-B479-C5EA5551B269@kirei.se> <6BCA1467-BC10-4A6F-8B26-725959D61878@opendnssec.org> <26928A0B-34F9-4A0C-B98E-25E31313D27C@openfortress.nl> Message-ID: <5DF5EE7C-70B9-4C98-B754-1FE3A6928B36@opendnssec.org> Hi, On Oct 7, 2013, at 10:59 , Rick van Rein (OpenFortress) wrote: >> It would be a lot better and more stable to add support for views correctly into the Enforcer and Signer and it might not even be a big job. Basically it has to do with the internal design of how zones and processed, the zone name is the unique key identifying a zone and what needs to be done is to add a view identifier that is included into the unique key for the zone (unless I missing something). This will enable Enforcer and Signer to have different paths, configurations, input and output for the same zone but for different views. > > That's what I'm saying indeed :-) -- except that I'd propose to not make the Enforcer aware of the split. I can't see how this will work without the Enforcer knowing about the view. The Enforcer generates the signconf today and if the Enforcer does not know about the different paths for the views how can it tell the Signer to load different zone data? There is also the issue about different keys for the views, are we absolutely sure that it will never be needed? I would rather have a design that has the option available (maybe not support at the first go). /Jerry -- Jerry Lundstr?m - OpenDNSSEC Developer http://www.opendnssec.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 625 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From rick at openfortress.nl Mon Oct 7 09:22:25 2013 From: rick at openfortress.nl (Rick van Rein (OpenFortress)) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:22:25 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Multiple views with current OpenDNSSEC (well, almost) In-Reply-To: <5DF5EE7C-70B9-4C98-B754-1FE3A6928B36@opendnssec.org> References: <318C12C1-CD85-4612-B479-C5EA5551B269@kirei.se> <6BCA1467-BC10-4A6F-8B26-725959D61878@opendnssec.org> <26928A0B-34F9-4A0C-B98E-25E31313D27C@openfortress.nl> <5DF5EE7C-70B9-4C98-B754-1FE3A6928B36@opendnssec.org> Message-ID: <6D51F2BA-6DA7-49BD-9C37-B767DD070D00@openfortress.nl> Hey, Excellent questions, good stuff to discuss tomorrow I suppose. Since use-cases are more helpful than generics, I will crack my skull trying to find examples that would require the Enforcer to be split. Cheers, -Rick From sara at sinodun.com Mon Oct 7 10:33:26 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:33:26 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Developer workshop Message-ID: Hi All, So this is another attempt to agree a date for a 3 day developer workshop which will be held in Stockholm. This time I am proposing that we hold the workshop either: - December 11th-13th - January 22nd-24th - January 29th-31st Please indicate your availability via the doodle: http://doodle.com/dx4nvtkcdyfhukmh Thanks! Sara. From sara at sinodun.com Mon Oct 7 11:04:14 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:04:14 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Team meeting - Tuesday 8 Oct @ 14:30 CEST Message-ID: <41C87AD1-3BDF-42C4-90CB-933E71B776F7@sinodun.com> Hi All, We have a team meeting on Tuesday this week (tomorrow) : Date: Tuesday 08 Oct 2013 Time: 14:30-15:30 CEST, 13:30-14:30 BST, 20:30 CST, 12:30 UTC Method: Teamspeak Agenda: https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/OpenDNSSEC/2013-10-08+Agenda Note this meeting is at 14:30 CEST (not 14:00 CEST as usual). Sara. From jakob at kirei.se Mon Oct 7 19:34:55 2013 From: jakob at kirei.se (Jakob Schlyter) Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 21:34:55 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Discussion of usability developments In-Reply-To: References: <7E8D398D-7631-4B93-BF34-238C4F44512D@sinodun.com>

Message-ID: <733FA80F-0677-421D-B771-25B474D56569@kirei.se> On 30 sep 2013, at 11:05, Jerry Lundstr?m wrote: > On the HOW; I object implementing email/xmpp/whatever support into the Enforcer and/or Signer because I don't think thats their purpose. For the record, I'm with Jerry here. I would like the OpenDNSSEC command line tools to be able to output in some machine readable format (JSON and/or XML). If you want to do X, you can then use the tool to extract some output and do X with it. jakob From jad at sinodun.com Tue Oct 8 11:07:48 2013 From: jad at sinodun.com (John Dickinson) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:07:48 +0000 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Sara is unable to make todays meeting Message-ID: <79160D6C-8F38-49E7-BBDC-1476051595D2@sinodun.com> Hi, Unfortunately, Sara is ill so she will not be able to make todays meeting. She said: "If someone wants to volunteer to chair it then please go ahead by letting this list know. If there are no volunteers by 1/2 hour before the meeting is due to start please consider the meeting cancelled." John --- jad at sinodun.com http://sinodun.com Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd. Stables 4, Suite 11, Howbery Park, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA, U.K. +44 (0)1491 834957 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 841 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From sion at nominet.org.uk Tue Oct 8 12:31:32 2013 From: sion at nominet.org.uk (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Si=F4n_Lloyd?=) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:31:32 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Sara is unable to make todays meeting In-Reply-To: <79160D6C-8F38-49E7-BBDC-1476051595D2@sinodun.com> References: <79160D6C-8F38-49E7-BBDC-1476051595D2@sinodun.com> Message-ID: <5253FB24.40705@nominet.org.uk> I've just gone to find the agenda etc and seen this... I'm assuming that the meeting is cancelled then? Sion On 08/10/13 12:07, John Dickinson wrote: > Hi, > > Unfortunately, Sara is ill so she will not be able to make todays meeting. She said: "If someone wants to volunteer to chair it then please go ahead by letting this list know. If there are no volunteers by 1/2 hour before the meeting is due to start please consider the meeting cancelled." > > > John > > > --- > jad at sinodun.com > > http://sinodun.com > > Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd. > Stables 4, Suite 11, > Howbery Park, > Wallingford, > Oxfordshire, > OX10 8BA, > U.K. > > +44 (0)1491 834957 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-develop mailing list > Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From yuri at nlnetlabs.nl Tue Oct 8 12:37:47 2013 From: yuri at nlnetlabs.nl (Yuri Schaeffer) Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:37:47 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Sara is unable to make todays meeting In-Reply-To: <5253FB24.40705@nominet.org.uk> References: <79160D6C-8F38-49E7-BBDC-1476051595D2@sinodun.com> <5253FB24.40705@nominet.org.uk> Message-ID: <5253FC9B.10900@nlnetlabs.nl> > I'm assuming that the meeting is cancelled then? We had a very brief meeting. With a small discussion about nsec3param and a plan to reschedule the meeting. Possibly October 22. //yuri From matthijs at nlnetlabs.nl Tue Oct 8 12:38:10 2013 From: matthijs at nlnetlabs.nl (Matthijs Mekking) Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:38:10 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Sara is unable to make todays meeting In-Reply-To: <5253FB24.40705@nominet.org.uk> References: <79160D6C-8F38-49E7-BBDC-1476051595D2@sinodun.com> <5253FB24.40705@nominet.org.uk> Message-ID: <5253FCB2.9050008@nlnetlabs.nl> We have just cancelled the meeting, although some people dialled in (Masson, Jakob, Yuri and myself). Short minutes of the cancelled meeting: * I go ahead with NSEC3PARAM TTL config option after Jakob's approval. * Suggested next meeting Oct 22 (since Jakob and I cannot make it th 24th). If any objections to Oct 22 please reply to this mail. Get well soon Sara! (and I hope I don't have to say that too often...) Best regards, Matthijs On 10/08/2013 02:31 PM, Si?n Lloyd wrote: > I've just gone to find the agenda etc and seen this... > > I'm assuming that the meeting is cancelled then? > > Sion > > On 08/10/13 12:07, John Dickinson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Unfortunately, Sara is ill so she will not be able to make todays meeting. She said: "If someone wants to volunteer to chair it then please go ahead by letting this list know. If there are no volunteers by 1/2 hour before the meeting is due to start please consider the meeting cancelled." >> >> >> John >> >> >> --- >> jad at sinodun.com >> >> http://sinodun.com >> >> Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd. >> Stables 4, Suite 11, >> Howbery Park, >> Wallingford, >> Oxfordshire, >> OX10 8BA, >> U.K. >> >> +44 (0)1491 834957 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Opendnssec-develop mailing list >> Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org >> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop > > > > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-develop mailing list > Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop > From wanggd at conac.cn Tue Oct 8 12:45:14 2013 From: wanggd at conac.cn (wangguodong) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 20:45:14 +0800 Subject: reply: [Opendnssec-develop] Sara is unable to make todays meeting In-Reply-To: <5253FCB2.9050008@nlnetlabs.nl> References: <79160D6C-8F38-49E7-BBDC-1476051595D2@sinodun.com> <5253FB24.40705@nominet.org.uk> <5253FCB2.9050008@nlnetlabs.nl> Message-ID: <009e01cec424$3bfe6e80$b3fb4b80$@cn> Sorry not to attend the meeting. I am waiting for the announce someone to organize the meeting. The meeting has already finished. -----????----- ???: opendnssec-develop-bounces at lists.opendnssec.org [mailto:opendnssec-develop-bounces at lists.opendnssec.org] ?? Matthijs Mekking ????: 2013?10?8? 20:38 ???: opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org ??: Re: [Opendnssec-develop] Sara is unable to make todays meeting We have just cancelled the meeting, although some people dialled in (Masson, Jakob, Yuri and myself). Short minutes of the cancelled meeting: * I go ahead with NSEC3PARAM TTL config option after Jakob's approval. * Suggested next meeting Oct 22 (since Jakob and I cannot make it th 24th). If any objections to Oct 22 please reply to this mail. Get well soon Sara! (and I hope I don't have to say that too often...) Best regards, Matthijs On 10/08/2013 02:31 PM, Si?n Lloyd wrote: > I've just gone to find the agenda etc and seen this... > > I'm assuming that the meeting is cancelled then? > > Sion > > On 08/10/13 12:07, John Dickinson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Unfortunately, Sara is ill so she will not be able to make todays meeting. She said: "If someone wants to volunteer to chair it then please go ahead by letting this list know. If there are no volunteers by 1/2 hour before the meeting is due to start please consider the meeting cancelled." >> >> >> John >> >> >> --- >> jad at sinodun.com >> >> http://sinodun.com >> >> Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd. >> Stables 4, Suite 11, >> Howbery Park, >> Wallingford, >> Oxfordshire, >> OX10 8BA, >> U.K. >> >> +44 (0)1491 834957 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Opendnssec-develop mailing list >> Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org >> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop > > > > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-develop mailing list > Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop > _______________________________________________ Opendnssec-develop mailing list Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop From rafiee at hpi.uni-potsdam.de Wed Oct 9 14:06:15 2013 From: rafiee at hpi.uni-potsdam.de (Rafiee, Hosnieh) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:06:15 +0000 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] opendnssec compile error Message-ID: <8EBBE4774B42FC45BA1143BE7F3F5A0F102213@MXMA2012.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> Hello, My OS is Centos latest version 32 bits. I added opendnssec to netbeans and added my own project file. When I want to compile it in netbeans I receive the following error. I didn't have any problem to make the project and install opendnssec. I searched on internet and it appears that the library which netbeans is looking for is for ubunta. I appreciate any comments or helps. Thanks, Best Regards, Hosnieh INFO: The XML in /etc/opendnssec/conf.xml is valid ERROR: Module (/usr/local/lib/softhsm/libsofthsm.so) does not exist INFO: The XML in /etc/opendnssec/zonelist.xml is valid ERROR: SQLite datastore (/var/opendnssec/kasp.db) does not exist INFO: The XML in /etc/opendnssec/kasp.xml is valid WARNING: In policy default, Y used in duration field for Keys/KSK Lifetime (P1Y) in /etc/opendnssec/kasp.xml - this will be interpreted as 365 days WARNING: In policy lab, Y used in duration field for Keys/KSK Lifetime (P1Y) in /etc/opendnssec/kasp.xml From jerry at opendnssec.org Wed Oct 9 14:16:59 2013 From: jerry at opendnssec.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jerry_Lundstr=F6m?=) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:16:59 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] opendnssec compile error In-Reply-To: <8EBBE4774B42FC45BA1143BE7F3F5A0F102213@MXMA2012.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> References: <8EBBE4774B42FC45BA1143BE7F3F5A0F102213@MXMA2012.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> Message-ID: Hi, On Oct 9, 2013, at 16:06 , Rafiee, Hosnieh wrote: > My OS is Centos latest version 32 bits. I added opendnssec to netbeans and added my own project file. When I want to compile it in netbeans I receive the following error. I didn't have any problem to make the project and install opendnssec. > I searched on internet and it appears that the library which netbeans is looking for is for ubunta. > I appreciate any comments or helps. These are not compile errors, they are runtime errors. Have you installed SoftHSM (as root)? If you want to run OpenDNSSEC in usermode via Netbeans you need to change all the paths, simplest way is with --prefix=$HOME/root/ (point it to a directory you own). I wouldn't advise you to run OpenDNSSEC in Netbeans since OpenDNSSEC consists of two daemons that starts and runs in the background, something Netbeans will have a big problem handling. /Jerry -- Jerry Lundstr?m - OpenDNSSEC Developer http://www.opendnssec.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 625 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From sion at nominet.org.uk Wed Oct 9 14:17:08 2013 From: sion at nominet.org.uk (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Si=F4n_Lloyd?=) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:17:08 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] opendnssec compile error In-Reply-To: <8EBBE4774B42FC45BA1143BE7F3F5A0F102213@MXMA2012.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> References: <8EBBE4774B42FC45BA1143BE7F3F5A0F102213@MXMA2012.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> Message-ID: <52556564.70101@nominet.org.uk> Hi. These look like errors you might see when running ODS rather than compiling. The first ERROR line indicates that softhsm is not installed (at least not on the path you have configured in conf.xml). The second error is saying that your kasp database does not exist, so you need to run "ods-ksmutil setup". Sion On 09/10/13 15:06, Rafiee, Hosnieh wrote: > Hello, > > My OS is Centos latest version 32 bits. I added opendnssec to netbeans and added my own project file. When I want to compile it in netbeans I receive the following error. I didn't have any problem to make the project and install opendnssec. > I searched on internet and it appears that the library which netbeans is looking for is for ubunta. > I appreciate any comments or helps. > > Thanks, > Best Regards, > Hosnieh > > > INFO: The XML in /etc/opendnssec/conf.xml is valid > ERROR: Module (/usr/local/lib/softhsm/libsofthsm.so) does not exist > INFO: The XML in /etc/opendnssec/zonelist.xml is valid > ERROR: SQLite datastore (/var/opendnssec/kasp.db) does not exist > INFO: The XML in /etc/opendnssec/kasp.xml is valid > WARNING: In policy default, Y used in duration field for Keys/KSK Lifetime (P1Y) in /etc/opendnssec/kasp.xml - this will be interpreted as 365 days > WARNING: In policy lab, Y used in duration field for Keys/KSK Lifetime (P1Y) in /etc/opendnssec/kasp.xml > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-develop mailing list > Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop From jerry at opendnssec.org Wed Oct 9 14:18:23 2013 From: jerry at opendnssec.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jerry_Lundstr=F6m?=) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:18:23 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] opendnssec compile error In-Reply-To: References: <8EBBE4774B42FC45BA1143BE7F3F5A0F102213@MXMA2012.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> Message-ID: On Oct 9, 2013, at 16:16 , Jerry Lundstr?m wrote: > If you want to run OpenDNSSEC in usermode via Netbeans you need to change all the paths, simplest way is with --prefix=$HOME/root/ (point it to a directory you own). And this would be a configure option of course (forgot to mention). -- Jerry Lundstr?m - OpenDNSSEC Developer http://www.opendnssec.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 625 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From jad at sinodun.com Thu Oct 10 13:04:31 2013 From: jad at sinodun.com (John Dickinson) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:04:31 +0000 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Discussion of usability developments In-Reply-To: <733FA80F-0677-421D-B771-25B474D56569@kirei.se> References: <7E8D398D-7631-4B93-BF34-238C4F44512D@sinodun.com>

<733FA80F-0677-421D-B771-25B474D56569@kirei.se> Message-ID: On 7 Oct 2013, at 19:34, Jakob Schlyter wrote: > On 30 sep 2013, at 11:05, Jerry Lundstr?m wrote: > >> On the HOW; I object implementing email/xmpp/whatever support into the Enforcer and/or Signer because I don't think thats their purpose. > > For the record, I'm with Jerry here. > > I would like the OpenDNSSEC command line tools to be able to output in some machine readable format (JSON and/or XML). If you want to do X, you can then use the tool to extract some output and do X with it. I don't think I ever suggested "implementing email/xmpp/whatever support into the Enforcer and/or Signer" - Depending on what the hooks are then they should go wherever is most appropriate. My issue is with just creating hooks. Adding just hooks does nothing to help users of what is supposed to be push button system. We should develop a set of useful and easy to configure scripts to access the hooks and perform the useful activity: be that email, xmpp or whatever the users request. Of course, if users want to contribute scripts that is great. John --- jad at sinodun.com http://sinodun.com Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd. Stables 4, Suite 11, Howbery Park, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA, U.K. +44 (0)1491 834957 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 841 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From jerry at opendnssec.org Mon Oct 14 08:26:12 2013 From: jerry at opendnssec.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jerry_Lundstr=F6m?=) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:26:12 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Demo/discussion about the progress of Lim and its plugins @RIPE67 Message-ID: Hi all, If anyone it interested in a demo or discussion about Lim, its plugins and the new GUI, at RIPE then please let me know and we can setup a meeting on Wednesday/Thursday when it suits people. For reference here are some URLs to Lim and the plugins: https://github.com/jelu/lim - The framework itself https://github.com/jelu/lim-plugin-opendnssec - Plugin for managing OpenDNSSEC https://github.com/jelu/lim-plugin-softhsm - Plugin for managing SoftHSM https://github.com/jelu/lim-plugin-dns - Plugin for managing zonefiles for different software (OpenDNSSEC/BIND etc) https://github.com/jelu/lim-plugin-orr/tree/develop - Plugin for managing OpenDNSSEC/SoftHSM installations (via their Lim plugins) to provide redundant solutions (currently the development tree since no release has been made yet) And of course, any discussion about Lim outside/after RIPE are also welcomed. Regards, Jerry -- Jerry Lundstr?m - OpenDNSSEC Developer http://www.opendnssec.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sara at sinodun.com Tue Oct 15 10:01:40 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:01:40 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Hello again Message-ID: Hi All, Well, I _think_ I'm better this time! I'm very sorry for any confusion last week over the team meeting?. I am at RIPE this week but will try to catch up with some emails over the next few days. Otherwise I should be in the office as normal for most of next week. Noted that the next team meeting is planned for Tuesday 22nd Oct - this is fine for me. Regards Sara. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From jerry at opendnssec.org Tue Oct 15 12:42:03 2013 From: jerry at opendnssec.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jerry_Lundstr=F6m?=) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:42:03 +0300 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Hello again In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <-8450442788222008025@unknownmsgid> > On 15 okt 2013, at 13:01, Sara Dickinson wrote: > > Noted that the next team meeting is planned for Tuesday 22nd Oct - this is fine for me. Can we say at 14:30 CEST then? I can't at 14:00. /Jerry From sara at sinodun.com Tue Oct 15 13:14:29 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:14:29 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Hello again In-Reply-To: <-8450442788222008025@unknownmsgid> References: <-8450442788222008025@unknownmsgid> Message-ID: <6695A5AE-80BB-442A-B414-146239180872@sinodun.com> On 15 Oct 2013, at 13:42, Jerry Lundstr?m wrote: >> On 15 okt 2013, at 13:01, Sara Dickinson wrote: >> >> Noted that the next team meeting is planned for Tuesday 22nd Oct - this is fine for me. > > Can we say at 14:30 CEST then? I can't at 14:00. OK by me. Sara. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From matthijs at nlnetlabs.nl Mon Oct 21 11:24:37 2013 From: matthijs at nlnetlabs.nl (Matthijs Mekking) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:24:37 +0200 Subject: reply: [Opendnssec-develop] signed serial > unsigned serial? In-Reply-To: <002401ceaebe$bc57c110$35074330$@cn> References: <522F182F.60407@nlnetlabs.nl> <522F2ED6.1080103@nlnetlabs.nl> <002401ceaebe$bc57c110$35074330$@cn> Message-ID: <52650EF5.1080102@nlnetlabs.nl> On 09/11/2013 09:15 AM, wangguodong wrote: > Hi, > > I think there is a relationship between the signed zone and unsigned zone. > > Because in the NEWG TLD applicant Guidebook, the registry's zone file should > be accessed by a third party.( AGB SPECIFICATION 4,P43) Is this requirement for the unsigned zone file or the signed zone file? If it is for the unsigned zone file, there are many more requirements this guidebook specifies which OpenDNSSEC also cannot guarantee. I believe the guidebook talks about the zone file that gets loaded into the name servers. > > So if a third party get an unsigned zone, the unsigned zone's serial is > higher than the current signed zone(can be dug from the internet), this may > be a problem. > > So as this, I think it's better to ensure the signed zone's serial higher > than the unsigned zone. These things can be achieved with operational actions, right? For example, use keep and maintain serial management outside of OpenDNSSEC. Best regards, Matthijs > > > Warren > > -----????----- > ???: opendnssec-develop-bounces at lists.opendnssec.org > [mailto:opendnssec-develop-bounces at lists.opendnssec.org] ?? Yuri Schaeffer > ????: 2013?9?10? 22:38 > ???: opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org > ??: Re: [Opendnssec-develop] signed serial > unsigned serial? > >> Should the signed serial always be higher than the unsigned serial? >> #OPENDNSSEC-446 #SUPPORT-73. > > I do not agree with the reporter that ODS should follow the unsigned serial. > As an admin you explicitly transfer the management responsibility to ODS. > The way you describe it is now sounds like the sanest solution to me. The > serial of an unpublished version of the zone is not relevant at all. > > //Yuri > > -- > Composed on an actual keyboard: all typos genuine. > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-develop mailing list > Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop > > > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-develop mailing list > Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop > From sara at sinodun.com Mon Oct 21 12:22:01 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:22:01 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Team meeting - Tuesday 22 Oct @ 14:30 CEST Message-ID: <443DC517-4087-4352-AF6C-F38D257B2232@sinodun.com> Hi All, We have a team meeting on Tuesday this week (tomorrow) : Date: Tuesday 22 Oct 2013 Time: 14:30-15:30 CEST, 13:30-14:30 BST, 20:30-21:30 CST, 12:30-13:30 UTC Method: Teamspeak Agenda: https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/OpenDNSSEC/2013-10-22+Agenda Note this meeting is at 14:30 CEST (not 14:00 CEST as usual). Sara. P.S. Calendar invitation attached (better late than never.....) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenDNSSEC meeting.ics Type: text/calendar Size: 713 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jerry at opendnssec.org Mon Oct 21 12:31:41 2013 From: jerry at opendnssec.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jerry_Lundstr=F6m?=) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:31:41 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Team meeting - Tuesday 22 Oct @ 14:30 CEST In-Reply-To: <443DC517-4087-4352-AF6C-F38D257B2232@sinodun.com> References: <443DC517-4087-4352-AF6C-F38D257B2232@sinodun.com> Message-ID: Hi, I'm currently home sick so I will not be able to attend. And because you moved it to 14.30 because of my other meetings you can move the meeting back if you wish. On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Sara Dickinson wrote: > Hi All, > > We have a team meeting on Tuesday this week (tomorrow) : > > Date: Tuesday 22 Oct 2013 > Time: 14:30-15:30 CEST, 13:30-14:30 BST, 20:30-21:30 CST, 12:30-13:30 > UTC > Method: Teamspeak > Agenda: https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/OpenDNSSEC/2013-10-22+Agenda > > Note this meeting is at 14:30 CEST (not 14:00 CEST as usual). > > Sara. > > P.S. Calendar invitation attached (better late than never.....) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Opendnssec-develop mailing list > Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org > https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop > > -- Jerry Lundstr?m - OpenDNSSEC Developer http://www.opendnssec.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sara at sinodun.com Mon Oct 21 12:42:13 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:42:13 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Team meeting - Tuesday 22 Oct @ 14:30 CEST In-Reply-To: References: <443DC517-4087-4352-AF6C-F38D257B2232@sinodun.com> Message-ID: <483C32AC-5DB2-48A6-BC69-5B6AA4395612@sinodun.com> On 21 Oct 2013, at 13:31, Jerry Lundstr?m wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently home sick so I will not be able to attend. And because you moved it to 14.30 because of my other meetings you can move the meeting back if you wish. Thanks for letting me know. I actually have other meetings booked tomorrow now so 14:30 CEST suits me best if that is OK with everyone else. Get well soon! Sara. From sara at sinodun.com Tue Oct 22 15:08:03 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:08:03 +0100 Subject: Fwd: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Team meeting - Tuesday 22 Oct @ 14:30 CEST References: <443DC517-4087-4352-AF6C-F38D257B2232@sinodun.com> Message-ID: <2F2553DC-D9F4-4896-BD23-1ABDEDC2101F@sinodun.com> Hi All, The minutes from the meeting today are available for review: https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/OpenDNSSEC/2013-10-22+Minutes The next meeting is planned for: Date: Thursday 7 Nov 2013 Time: 14:00-15:00 CET, 13:00-14:00 GMT, 21:00-22:00 CST, 13:00-14:00 UTC Note that the clocks change in Sweden, Netherlands and the UK between now and that meeting. Sorry China - that means the meeting is even later for you :-( Sara. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenDNSSEC meeting.ics Type: text/calendar Size: 713 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- Begin forwarded message: > From: Sara Dickinson > Date: 21 October 2013 13:22:01 GMT+01:00 > To: "opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org Developers" > Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Team meeting - Tuesday 22 Oct @ 14:30 CEST > > Hi All, > > We have a team meeting on Tuesday this week (tomorrow) : > > Date: Tuesday 22 Oct 2013 > Time: 14:30-15:30 CEST, 13:30-14:30 BST, 20:30-21:30 CST, 12:30-13:30 UTC > Method: Teamspeak > Agenda: https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/OpenDNSSEC/2013-10-22+Agenda > > Note this meeting is at 14:30 CEST (not 14:00 CEST as usual). > > Sara. > From sara at sinodun.com Tue Oct 22 16:04:46 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:04:46 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Availability Message-ID: <917257B2-8CA7-4F4A-BE15-A1C479076472@sinodun.com> Hi All, Just to let you know that prompted by Matthijs mentioning IETF next year I have created the 2014 Availability page: https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/OpenDNSSEC/Availability+2014 Please indicate your availability or attendance at conferences as and when you know it on this page to help with scheduling meetings. I briefly looked into calendar plugins for Confluence but none of them looked any good to me. If anyone wants to suggest a better way to keep track of meetings and availability please do! And if I may say it seems London is _the_ place for meetings next year ;-) Sara. From jakob at kirei.se Fri Oct 25 14:12:30 2013 From: jakob at kirei.se (Jakob Schlyter) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:12:30 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] FYI: Minor sub projects moving to git Message-ID: <02ADA850-54C4-4CA1-9F88-AB8A1D276DF5@kirei.se> I'm moving some minor sub projects to git (https://github.com/opendnssec). Nothing happening for OpenDNSSEC trunk in a while (although we're planning for it), but non-active stuff might move. I'll leave a README file in SVN so people can find their way to the future. jakob From jakob at kirei.se Fri Oct 25 14:45:27 2013 From: jakob at kirei.se (Jakob Schlyter) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:45:27 +0200 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] FYI: Minor sub projects moving to git In-Reply-To: <02ADA850-54C4-4CA1-9F88-AB8A1D276DF5@kirei.se> References: <02ADA850-54C4-4CA1-9F88-AB8A1D276DF5@kirei.se> Message-ID: On 25 okt 2013, at 16:12, Jakob Schlyter wrote: > I'm moving some minor sub projects to git (https://github.com/opendnssec). Nothing happening for OpenDNSSEC trunk in a while (although we're planning for it), but non-active stuff might move. I'll leave a README file in SVN so people can find their way to the future. Moved so far: - https://github.com/opendnssec/pkcs15-dnssec - https://github.com/opendnssec/ods4bind About to be moved (next week): - trunk/auditor - trunk/eppclient - trunk/hsmbully Maybe should also move trunk/monitor, but I need to discuss that with Sion/Alex first. jakob From sara at sinodun.com Fri Oct 25 16:05:04 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:05:04 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Developer workshop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <995A7115-7B09-4A8C-BD68-646A7C8D31FC@sinodun.com> On 7 Oct 2013, at 11:33, Sara Dickinson wrote: > Hi All, > > So this is another attempt to agree a date for a 3 day developer workshop which will be held in Stockholm. > > This time I am proposing that we hold the workshop either: > > - December 11th-13th Hi All, So we are a go for a Developer Workshop hosted by .SE in Stockholm December 11th-13th :-) So far I believe the following people are planning on attending: Sara Jakob Patrik Matthijs Yuri Sion Masson Warren Any changes to this please let me know asap (Jerry is it correct that unfortunately you can't attend any of these days?). Masson/Warren please let me know if you need any documentation to support your visa applications. I will put an agenda out next week. See you in Stockholm! Sara. From sara at sinodun.com Mon Oct 28 16:29:10 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:29:10 +0000 Subject: Fwd: [Opendnssec-develop] Developer workshop References: <995A7115-7B09-4A8C-BD68-646A7C8D31FC@sinodun.com> Message-ID: Hi All, Please find a wiki page with details of the developer workshop and a first pass at a draft agenda here: https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/OpenDNSSEC/Developer+Workshop+-+Stockholm+Dec+2013 Please let me know if you have any topics you would like covered at the workshop that are not on this agenda, have any suggestions for other sessions we could have or if you would like any sessions moved around. Regards Sara. Begin forwarded message: > From: Sara Dickinson > Subject: Re: [Opendnssec-develop] RE: Developer workshop > Date: 25 October 2013 17:05:04 BST > To: "opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org Developers" > > Hi All, > > So we are a go for a Developer Workshop hosted by .SE in Stockholm December 11th-13th :-) > > So far I believe the following people are planning on attending: > > Sara > Jakob > Patrik > Matthijs > Yuri > Sion > Masson > Warren > > Any changes to this please let me know asap (Jerry is it correct that unfortunately you can't attend any of these days?). Masson/Warren please let me know if you need any documentation to support your visa applications. I will put an agenda out next week. > > See you in Stockholm! > > Sara. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From jerry at opendnssec.org Wed Oct 30 09:26:36 2013 From: jerry at opendnssec.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jerry_Lundstr=F6m?=) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:26:36 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Maintenance of dist.opendnssec.org and SVN today Wednesday 13:30 - 14:00 CET Message-ID: <161DAB95-D942-44CF-B314-E3CFCB576EA7@opendnssec.org> Hi, I would like to do some maintenance work on the servers here at .SE so please don't use SVN during this time. -- Jerry Lundstr?m - OpenDNSSEC Developer http://www.opendnssec.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 625 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From sara at sinodun.com Wed Oct 30 12:15:03 2013 From: sara at sinodun.com (Sara Dickinson) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:15:03 +0000 Subject: Fwd: [Opendnssec-develop] Developer workshop References: Message-ID: Hi All, I forgot to mention - if anyone has any dietary restrictions or other special requirements for the workshop please do let me know so they can be accommodated. Sara. Begin forwarded message: > From: Sara Dickinson > Date: 28 October 2013 16:29:10 GMT > To: "opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org Dev" > Subject: Fwd: [Opendnssec-develop] Developer workshop > > Hi All, > > Please find a wiki page with details of the developer workshop and a first pass at a draft agenda here: > > https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/OpenDNSSEC/Developer+Workshop+-+Stockholm+Dec+2013 > > Please let me know if you have any topics you would like covered at the workshop that are not on this agenda, have any suggestions for other sessions we could have or if you would like any sessions moved around. > > Regards > > Sara. > > Begin forwarded message: From jerry at opendnssec.org Wed Oct 30 12:49:51 2013 From: jerry at opendnssec.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jerry_Lundstr=F6m?=) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:49:51 +0100 Subject: [Opendnssec-develop] Re: Maintenance of dist.opendnssec.org and SVN today Wednesday 13:30 - 14:00 CET In-Reply-To: <161DAB95-D942-44CF-B314-E3CFCB576EA7@opendnssec.org> References: <161DAB95-D942-44CF-B314-E3CFCB576EA7@opendnssec.org> Message-ID: On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:26 , Jerry Lundstr?m wrote: > I would like to do some maintenance work on the servers here at .SE so please don't use SVN during this time. Maintenance is done. -- Jerry Lundstr?m - OpenDNSSEC Developer http://www.opendnssec.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 625 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: