[Opendnssec-develop] Fwd: Minutes and Actions from RIPE 66

Sara Dickinson sara at sinodun.com
Mon May 27 13:54:31 UTC 2013

On 21 May 2013, at 09:15, Matthijs Mekking wrote:

> On 05/21/2013 07:57 AM, Rick van Rein (OpenFortress) wrote:
>> Textual: Should "a minor version bump (to 1.5) under the new policy"
>> be "…under the current policy"?
> To my understanding this should indeed read as "under the current policy".

Updated in the minutes :-)

>> On the contents: It's a pitty that the version policy doesn't state
>> "when the same options are used, the new feature must not lead to
>> different behaviour".  Shouldn't that have been part of the
>> solution?
> We have agreed on that during the meetings. And I agree that we should
> such text that to the wiki.

I have created a draft version of an updated policy page. If you use this link it will show the diff:



More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list