[Opendnssec-develop] Re: Versioning scheme

[Olaf Kolkman]

WFM, one question though.


On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:29 AM, Roland van Rijswijk - Deij <Roland.vanRijswijk at surfnet.nl> wrote:

>> Proposed scheme
>> -----------------------------
>> 
>> Something along the lines of  e.g. http://semver.org/ which summarises to:
>> 
>> 	• <name> - The name of the software, e.g. opendnssec or softhsm.
>> 	• <major> - Backwards incompatible changes must increase the major version.
>> 	• <minor> - New, backwards compatible functionality, deprecated functionality, or substantial new functionality within private code.

I read this as:
deprecated functionality while maintaining backward compatibility. 

It is probably good to make that explicit.



--Olaf

NLnet
Labs
Olaf M. Kolkman

www.NLnetLabs.nl
olaf at NLnetLabs.nl

Science Park 400, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-develop/attachments/20130314/1e4526e0/attachment.htm>