[Opendnssec-develop] [Opendnssec-user] opendnssec: NSEC3PARAM TTL
sara at sinodun.com
Thu Sep 13 08:52:29 UTC 2012
On 13 Sep 2012, at 08:51, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> On 13 sep 2012, at 09:39, Matthijs Mekking <matthijs at NLnetLabs.nl> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> What does the team think? I have not a strong opinion about it, but
>> think Miek has a point.
> I think TTL=0 makes sense, https://issues.opendnssec.org/browse/OPENDNSSEC-330
Doesn't sound like this makes a great deal of difference either way.... so I think I would say since there isn't a good reason NOT to use TTL=0 then lets do what BIND does.
> Opendnssec-develop mailing list
> Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org
More information about the Opendnssec-develop