[Opendnssec-develop] Fwd: [issues.opendnssec.org] (OPENDNSSEC-342) Case-sensite comparison in auditor

[Jerry Lundström]

Hi,

I forward this to the developer list for discussion.

We have it in
https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/OpenDNSSEC/Release+Management+Processto
support older versions and it is somewhat confusing since we have been
using minor version numbering as major releases.

According to current process we today should support 1.2 and 1.1 but if
that feasible?

/Jerry

Begin forwarded message:

*From:* Siôn Lloyd (JIRA) <issues at opendnssec.org>
*Date:* 23 oktober 2012 11:03:22 CEST
*To:* jerry at opendnssec.org
*Subject:* *[issues.opendnssec.org] (OPENDNSSEC-342) Case-sensite
comparison in auditor*

        Siôn Lloyd<https://issues.opendnssec.org/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=sion>resolved
[image:
Bug] OPENDNSSEC-342 <https://issues.opendnssec.org/browse/OPENDNSSEC-342>as
*Fixed*
 *Case-sensite comparison in
auditor*<https://issues.opendnssec.org/browse/OPENDNSSEC-342>

Patched the code in the 1.3 branch (see rev 6758)
I am going to patch the auditor held in trunk, but should we really be
patching 1.2?
   *Change By:*  Siôn
Lloyd<https://issues.opendnssec.org/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=sion>(2012-10-23
11:02)
*Status:*  Open Resolved   *Assignee:*  Alex Dalitz Siôn Lloyd   *Fix
Version/s:*  1.3.11   *Fix Version/s:*  1.2.3   *Resolution:*  Fixed       This
message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
administrators<https://issues.opendnssec.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa>
.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-develop/attachments/20121023/7ddd46ce/attachment.htm>