Re: [Opendnssec-develop] Benchmarking hardware at SURFnet on the way … so what OS?

[Matthijs Mekking]

On 11/06/2012 01:34 PM, Roland van Rijswijk - Deij wrote:
> 
> On 6 nov. 2012, at 10:11, Siôn Lloyd <sion at nominet.org.uk> wrote:
> 
>> On 05/11/12 18:37, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
>>> On 5 nov 2012, at 17:18, Matthijs Mekking <matthijs at nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Red Hat, because for benchmarking I think you want to be as close to the expectations of the users and then I think that argument weights more than the easy and free one.
>>>>
>>>> Fedora might be a good alternative.
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Wouldn't it be slightly odd to use an OS that we do not have in Jenkins? Even if it is from the same family.
>>
>> I'd say RedHat or Centos.
> 
> 
> +1
> 
> We can supply a Red Hat licence so don't worry about cost

Then +1 for RHEL

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Roland
> 
> -- Roland M. van Rijswijk - Deij
> -- SURFnet bv
> -- w: http://www.surfnet.nl/en/
> -- t: +31-30-2305388
> -- e: roland.vanrijswijk at surfnet.nl
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Opendnssec-develop mailing list
> Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org
> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 551 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-develop/attachments/20121106/d7cfc296/attachment.bin>