[Opendnssec-develop] RE: Regression testing update

Sara Dickinson sara at sinodun.com
Thu Dec 6 13:16:01 UTC 2012


On 6 Dec 2012, at 12:42, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
> 
> I like the idea of structuring tests, although I think those names may become quite long, especially later if we have to test weird, specific corner cases. (signer-adapters-many_dns_updates_all_ixfr_over_udp_and_some_packets_are_dropped)

Point taken...I guess I has assumed we would stick to 2 or 3 words...

> 
> Perhaps signer-adapters-XXXX where XXXX is just a number?

You are right - numbers would help. What about 3 words and a number:

signer-adapters-bind-XXX
signer-zones-validation-XXX
enforcer-keys-backup-XXX
enforcer-keys-rollover-XXX

>> 
>> This does rely on the comments in the tests being accurate and up to
>> date but that seems a good idea anyway!  Please try this out and let
>> me know if you think this approach makes sense.
> 
> I like this idea. I think the comments are mainly useful for tracking which JIRA issue is tested (which I know aren't many now).

Thanks for the feedback.

Sara.

> 
> Best regards,
>  Matthijs
> 




More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list