[Opendnssec-develop] RE: Regression testing update
Sara Dickinson
sara at sinodun.com
Thu Dec 6 13:16:01 UTC 2012
On 6 Dec 2012, at 12:42, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
>
> I like the idea of structuring tests, although I think those names may become quite long, especially later if we have to test weird, specific corner cases. (signer-adapters-many_dns_updates_all_ixfr_over_udp_and_some_packets_are_dropped)
Point taken...I guess I has assumed we would stick to 2 or 3 words...
>
> Perhaps signer-adapters-XXXX where XXXX is just a number?
You are right - numbers would help. What about 3 words and a number:
signer-adapters-bind-XXX
signer-zones-validation-XXX
enforcer-keys-backup-XXX
enforcer-keys-rollover-XXX
>>
>> This does rely on the comments in the tests being accurate and up to
>> date but that seems a good idea anyway! Please try this out and let
>> me know if you think this approach makes sense.
>
> I like this idea. I think the comments are mainly useful for tracking which JIRA issue is tested (which I know aren't many now).
Thanks for the feedback.
Sara.
>
> Best regards,
> Matthijs
>
More information about the Opendnssec-develop
mailing list