[Opendnssec-develop] packaging questions about softhsm

Paul Wouters paul at xelerance.com
Wed Oct 5 22:08:49 UTC 2011

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Jakob Schlyter wrote:

> Subject: Re: [Opendnssec-develop] packaging questions about softhsm
> On 7 mar 2011, at 09.57, Rickard Bellgrim wrote:
>>> If it is a module and not a shared library, then it should not be installed in /usr/lib* ?
>>> Perhaps a better place would be /usr/lib/softhsm/ ?
>> Yes, perhaps. What do you think Jakob?
> Yes, much better.

Unfortunately, version 1.3.0 did not fix this issue yet.

For the softhsm package under review for fedora/rhel/centos, I've changed
the location passed by configure to be /usr/lib{64}/softhsm/ to prevent
the system from treating it has a shared library.

See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711895


More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list