[Opendnssec-develop] signconf.rnc

[Matthijs Mekking]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Fine with me.

The python code never did a RNG check. The c code currently does not
either (as I encountered segfault in the code).

Best regards,

Matthijs

On 05/16/2011 04:50 PM, Siôn Lloyd wrote:
> Does anyone object to me changing the "element Iterations" entry in the
> NSEC3 blob to be a nonNegativeInteger instead of a positiveInteger?
> 
> This will allow an iterations value of 0... (I'm guessing that the
> python signer never checked the signconfs?)
> 
> Then, more importantly, do we need to patch this fix back into the 1.2
> branch?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Sion
> _______________________________________________
> Opendnssec-develop mailing list
> Opendnssec-develop at lists.opendnssec.org
> https://lists.opendnssec.org/mailman/listinfo/opendnssec-develop

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN0jCUAAoJEA8yVCPsQCW5WFAIAJUm288u8Ctytu4ZXQ/6sQ3N
LRL+CnA4ws39xptA8IfydTdTufA0ltVJDym6RuELn8EomBtT63M3GtkJp0kWIQ7I
L0gYlftahOSMx5xK0A1qSF5lIs1FdEpbWfrOFxD3HJCeyHHxjDO4kpgfIkPDg4WX
ZAvmyyooyzA2dDWQoRH9UAZzxRTYPMXZuWKxJWZjkAdPOYNyodsd91t21YfBdbkY
CilCLzsPP0/Pj5wtE0t+A/Au8mYQ5qoFF35kNKxqOZcuQZvVG4HbvoA8vc9rB4dF
gm3bdKbeghQ0DREL+exNcd0nw8BeiE5rNswXIgsxqKchTIC+LTJ3GuP5BPzGY1k=
=RzsF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----