[Opendnssec-develop] Erroneous jitter semantics
Matthijs Mekking
matthijs at NLnetLabs.nl
Thu Mar 11 13:31:15 UTC 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jelte Jansen wrote:
> obviously i prefer +jitter since i wrote that line :p (less room for
> fatal error, i think longer expiration than expected contains less
> potential problems than shorter expiration than expected)
+1 fwiw (shooting foot issue)
Matthijs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLmPChAAoJEA8yVCPsQCW511EIAIqGW+Ur4cLPXUsnzSG6BjkE
vSG8rBkEwNzrXnHvZExSQ6cMlb8Y+gw4vgjgHqaUfPzytUBbLCwV0/IUqnuMYtLp
tUnwVxss7rS+sAWWlPuRgVMPGckATdoEBaYYm/o523EzmusKxGVATURYIGBMWtJj
MW0lV8SBlWx/wjYA5wOJNWF0qBexVv8hTE7cw0gUt0hdqkcln3nawkEStxuYJ5JS
SHju7LUUYca4o2KYFbDaA4VzsMiZpceKCeolIgLYQF2QJ37+5WIoY5OXrSBKgYA6
fbaQQ1R0wRKjhbah2wGwnfR0r1MLI3rvWndb9TLE5JLDAATP5wdZjpSVkdL8P2c=
=kV+8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Opendnssec-develop
mailing list