[Opendnssec-develop] Erroneous jitter semantics
patrik.wallstrom at iis.se
Thu Mar 11 12:50:47 UTC 2010
On Mar 11, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
> On 11 mar 2010, at 12.07, Rickard Bellgrim wrote:
>> Ok, so lets go with +/- jitter/2. I think it should just be a one-liner in the Signer. We also need to update the picture in the documentation.
> actually it is: expiration' = expiration - jitter + (rnd % (jitter * 2))
> stories added and assigned.
I like the jitter parameter much better now, with this solution. Can we convince ISC to change jitter to this as well?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Opendnssec-develop