[Opendnssec-develop] Optimization of the sorter

[Matthijs Mekking]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rickard Bellgrim wrote:
>> Thank you, now I can better explain to Björn what we are doing with the
>> internal zone handling. I can recommend to him to split the parsing and
>> sorting into two parts, where parsing is only done upon request.
>  
> A question from Björn:
> Is it ok to keep a comment that is on the same line as a RR? Would
> something break later in the chain? A comment will be dropped if there
> is no RR before it on the same line.

It's ok to keep a comment on the same line, just be aware that when ldns
is creating a new RR from string, it will ignore these anyway. And thus
when writing back the RR, the comments will still be lost.

I guess that can be fixed by introducing new variables in the
curr_rr_data structure.

Matthijs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLTYE5AAoJEA8yVCPsQCW525oIALwDuUS+Qmz/YrB6jOJzYsEq
HSTwExGKblfFi4bP0LRa4uzgxgdoghLK3qzSPI30aTqvurwm9+deoQD5e8lza1b7
7Jeby3wLvPrY0s25jKNol3W7U8VxV7leZIpatL8GhpBZ4dx9N4YjD6BNcCig5M/R
iyttGnL8NRddrMDu0Y+dL4/dkT/v5FcmABlZu/gHkQ32vofnJn5wwWfwpV53+DWW
Q1b4tM/v+5lBdUG/v+HVGn+B2e58Iw0MKtMHOJv205gCxZe8t0Yh1fceecz5bTWl
9s4svZiPVnaN5kkJZgu7nnsKwomsL/USscjPS+pYyGBCB5gJUEw9mY+ffECMvnE=
=135d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----