[Opendnssec-develop] Auditor daemon

Jakob Schlyter jakob at kirei.se
Mon Aug 24 09:57:37 UTC 2009

On 24 aug 2009, at 11.53, Patrik Wallstrom wrote:

> Perhaps the chain always would be like this instead: unsigned ->  
> (audit) -> signed. Then you always know the process.

I agree, but in this case the auditor never has to run as a daemon,  


More information about the Opendnssec-develop mailing list