SV: [Opendnssec-develop] SoftHSM

[Olaf Kolkman]

On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Roland van Rijswijk wrote:

> Point taken. If you want the soft token module to be as small in
> footprint as possible and as simple as possible,


clarification question: are we assuming these are requirements for the  
softtoken in OpenDNSSEC or is this an observation about the needs of  
smartcard builders?

I read the latter but if the former I want to understand the arguments  
for the requirements.


--Olaf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.opendnssec.org/pipermail/opendnssec-develop/attachments/20081210/c451bebb/attachment.bin>