<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 04/10/11 13:50, Jerry Lundström wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGTFMNZMHzKnMYE3Ei3xtUVBuQTs4nMSSEZSo1u8RUgs1XLudw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:37 PM, John Dickinson <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:jad@sinodun.com">jad@sinodun.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>My initial thoughts are that anything where we support
multiple versions (e.g. if we supported ruby18 and ruby19
and jruby) or if the version changes often then we should
have jenkins install it. At the moment there are only single
versions of group 1 listed in the documentation and I have
no feel for how much this list changes.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
The first group is the interesting one. We can support
specific/minimum version or we can say we support ubuntu 10.04
and then we have to rely on the versions in that dist.<br>
<br>
A vote perhaps, +specific or +dist ?<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
The one time I can recall this being an issue was with sqlite on
redhat/centos, where the version reported is not always the actual
version installed...<br>
<br>
It would be more friendly to support a distribution; unless we have
compelling reasons to use newer or non-standard libraries. So maybe
we would need the ability to turn features off (e.g. --no-gost)
where they would not be available on the vanilla distribution?<br>
<br>
Of course this wouldn't help the test environment.<br>
<br>
Sion<br>
</body>
</html>