<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from rtf -->
<style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<font face="Arial" size="2">
<div>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----</div>
<div>Hash: SHA256</div>
<div> </div>
<div>> I think that anything that can't be fixed by some text in the</div>
<div>> KNOWN_ISSUES</div>
<div>> file means that we need an RC4.</div>
<div>> </div>
<div>> The image I had in my mind was that when 1.0.0 is released we branch;</div>
<div>> then</div>
<div>> bug fixes go into both branches and new features go into trunk only.</div>
<div>> Then,</div>
<div>> maybe when the KNOWN_ISSUES file is empty, we can release 1.0.1...</div>
<div>> Branching now just means that there is some merging to be done sooner</div>
<div>> (if</div>
<div>> RC3 doesn't become 1.0).</div>
<div> </div>
<div>So what I am hearing is the we are leaning toward to branch when 1.0.0 is released and for now only write text to KNOWN_ISSUES. If the problem is major, then we need to do a RC4 (and other commits are then allowed before we do RC4).</div>
<div> </div>
<div>// Rickard</div>
<div> </div>
<div>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----</div>
<div>Version: 9.8.3 (Build 4028)</div>
<div>Charset: utf-8</div>
<div> </div>
<div>wsBVAwUBS17B9+CjgaNTdVjaAQgIEAf/XHaJh67SUH9OELY7cBUfHYPgjplyu3qf</div>
<div>yEeNrfDIbFLSsckQZETvl+LCjM6yMY/BroZMF0Mazr8hLgCTSiSWYIqSO5e+GeMt</div>
<div>ZgsVhVO4DmdV2qOL5zXAq6gVLkYO7s8WocJidRasA+S2lhYSUc1BamojMeNod3P7</div>
<div>VUJDfXa+mB+XDLB0rlQZwt0llVoiDLbhFGrjjacmXqgMkPDk2ZLCqymPeG4JnF2K</div>
<div>ld8z1FpCh8WqRgrhMlMOv8H3iVUGwv0wHpmIdQxXRZglXsawehy3NtifwTTr1gZU</div>
<div>5/PPfK6JK9Ws3UFmIlGzIk9h+1VnnP1CW/kYLuEw2E0K4nhnqviJcQ==</div>
<div>=SFub</div>
<div>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</font>
</body>
</html>